Nuclear Stalemate essays

Nuclear Stalemate essays The biggest problem facing the world today is solely the fact that giving up all nuclear weapons is virtually impossible. If attempts were made at mutual disarmament three problems would occur. One being that, ists and ist nations are seeking to acquire nuclear weapons for ist acts. Another being that, a stalemate has developed between the superpowers, in which if one country attacks another then they are assured mutual destruction. Lastly, if one is needed tactically none are available to prevent more shed. Lets say there was an agreement for mutual disarmament. Russia, China, England, the U.S. and every other nuclear power gave up there weapons. All those superpowers did was make themselves vulnerable to the ists that have no desire for peaceful disarmament. ists defiantly would not give up their nuclear weapons. Then it would be impossible to disarm them. We have them, not to use them. They on the other hand, would have them to use them. Because ists dont care whether or not they live, giving them the advantage in nuclear power would threaten the defenseless superpower greatly. Shortly after WWII, five countries obtained nuclear capability and the arms race began. With the threat of total destruction, due to armament of superpowers, an unwritten understanding between superpowers came about that nuclear weapons wouldnt be used tactically, but they would only be used strategically. They wouldnt be used tactically, meaning, they wouldnt be used in conventional warfare. They would be used strategically, meaning, I wont blow you up if you dont blow me up. This created a stalemate that, if disrupted, could create mass destruction. If we study history, we can observe that it tends to repeat itself. Millions of lives were saved by the tactical use of nuclear in Japan at the end of WWII. If this hadnt been done, millions of Ja...